The last couple of years have seen a bevy of construction projects, redevelopment proposals, and business openings and closings across Batavia, Geneva, and St. Charles.

In a recent poll, Tri-Cities Central readers shared how they feel about where their towns are headed. The responses show a mix of optimism, frustration, and an acute feeling of affection for the area’s small-town character.

Out of 323 respondents, those who described their outlook as “a mixed bag” were nearly evenly matched with those who said they were “excited about the future.” 

Only about 12% expressed serious concerns about the direction of their communities. Many say they understand change is necessary, but want it managed in a way that preserves what makes each community unique. 

“Towns have to continue to change and grow,” one person wrote. “If they stagnate and have nothing to offer each generation, towns run the risk of becoming ghost towns.”

That sentiment — embracing progress without losing identity — permeated the responses. Residents repeatedly referenced the small-town feel that still defines their town, especially in Batavia and Geneva. 

And across all three cities, the comments revealed a shared sense of connection and ownership. Most locals seem proud of where they live, and as a result, they feel protective about what comes next.

Batavia residents expressed a strong sense of connection to the town.

“I love how close-knit the community is, the events that bring us all together, and how walkable and bikeable the city is,” one person wrote, representing a common theme.

Another said, “The future’s so bright, I gotta wear shades!”

At the same time, a sense of frustration emerged about some of the city’s recent growing pains. Several residents criticized the newly approved data center, citing its scale and environmental impact. 

One summed it up as “overreach of data centers and concentrated building,” warning about stress on local water resources and green space. Others described the project as “out of place” or “irresponsible and reckless.”

A considerable portion of respondents cited the downtown area. While many support the revitalization of River Street and other downtown sites, there’s a mix of opinions about how far redevelopment should go. 

“I’m concerned about the potential redevelopment of North River Street,” a respondent wrote. “We need to maintain as much of the river views downtown for public access as possible. River Street was named River Street for a reason.” 

Others cited the influx of new businesses and restaurants as a positive, but felt that there’s opportunity for more growth and stability in the business community. 

For Batavians, it seems the debate isn’t focused on growth itself — it’s how best to grow without losing the elements of warmth and authenticity that have grown to define the town for many who live there.  

Geneva residents voiced pride in their city’s historic character, even as they grapple with issues affecting the aesthetics and functionality of the downtown area. 

The comments revealed a thread: residents still see Geneva as “smaller and charming,” even as new developments add density downtown and projects like the ongoing East State Street work remain a hassle. However, most seem to recognize that growing pains are part of the process.

“The construction on East State Street is a pain,” one respondent said. “But it’s desperately needed.” 

The Mill Race Inn and blacksmith shop redevelopment topic appeared several times among the responses. Unsurprisingly, opinions varied. 

“Geneva seems to have a good focus on conditional growth keeping an eye on preservation,” one resident said. “The Mill Race property is an example of good public policy.”

Others expressed weariness about the lack of progress on that downtown corner. 

“The Mill Race Inn development controversy is getting ridiculous," another said. “The building looks terrible and needs to come down. The Shodeens own it! They have done nothing but good things to add to the revenue and charm of Geneva.” 

Some residents complimented City of Geneva staff on their approach to land use and development. 

“I recognize that the master plan and maps are living and breathing documents subject to the realities of what the individual property owners want to do with their land use,” one person said.

Still, Geneva’s “charming feel” remains a point of emphasis. Many comments reflect appreciation for the city’s look and character, but cited specific examples where improvements could be beneficial. 

“Geneva needs to clean up old buildings that are eyesores — even if they are historic — and get businesses into vacant storefronts” one resident wrote, while another lamented, “Everything is for the wealthy.” 

Taken as a whole, these voices indicate a desire for balanced growth that’s in alignment with the town’s character and aesthetic.

Among St. Charles respondents, optimism seemed to be the prevailing mood. Several pointed to recent and planned projects as signs of healthy progress. 

“Mayor Hull is doing an amazing job at the helm of St. Charles!” one wrote. “I like the way the City is developing the downtown riverfront area.”

A number of residents tied that sense of momentum to key redevelopment sites, particularly Fox Haven Square and the long-stalled Charlestowne Mall. The Fox Haven Square site should be ready for visitors by the end of the year or early 2026, while the fate of Charlestown Mall isn’t yet quite as clear.

“Redevelopment of the Charlestown Mall should be a priority,” one resident said. “We should also focus on creating a cohesive downtown shopping area like Geneva.”

That perspective highlights how St. Charles residents see retail variety as an opportunity for progress. Many praised 1st Street Plaza and the vibrancy and walkability of downtown, but urged city leaders to keep expanding options that make it easier for people to do their shopping close to home.

As is often the case with quick growth, not everyone feels optimistic about changes to the downtown area. 

“Previous administrations approved too many apartments and too many bars, changing the nature of the community” one person said. “I think St. Charles just needs to take a break with the downtown building,” added another.

For the most part, however, comments reflected a group that sees development as a sign of vitality rather than disruption. While a few mentioned parking and traffic as ongoing challenges, most expressed confidence that new projects are steering St. Charles toward a positive future. 

Though a smaller share of responses came from Campton Hills, almost all of them referenced the LaFox of Campton Hills development project. 

Residents are concerned that it could compromise the rural character that drew them to the area — particularly in terms of traffic and infrastructure inconveniences. 

“The road congestion alone will be a nightmare anywhere west of Randall Road and south of North Avenue,” one person said.

Across the Tri-Cities area, it’s clear the residents care deeply about where their communities are headed — and lean toward optimism. Most respondents seem most concerned about how that change will be managed in the months and years ahead.

Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] with questions or comments.

Not signed up yet? Subscribe here.