Welcome to Tri-Cities Central, a twice-weekly newsletter highlighting local happenings in Batavia, Geneva, St. Charles and surrounding communities.
Get yours: subscribe here. Refer a friend: share this link.

📸 Credit: St. Charles Committee of the Whole meeting agenda
A sizable group of residents spoke up against a proposed 76-home subdivision on the northern 38 acres of Red Gate Farm during a St. Charles Committee of the Whole meeting on April 20, with neighbors citing traffic safety, water pressure, and the loss of open space as reasons for opposition.
The developer, M/I Homes, presented a revised concept plan for the development called Claibourne Farm. The proposal calls for annexing the unincorporated farmland into St. Charles and building new homes (with up to five bedrooms) ranging from roughly 2,870 to 3,415 square feet.
In response to feedback on the original proposal during a plan commission meeting in November, the new concept reduces the total number of homes from 83 to 76.
Here's what to know:
Traffic access was a theme: The property is landlocked, and M/I's plan routes all traffic through a single entrance onto Rosebud Drive, a narrow residential street that runs through the Reserve of St. Charles and River's Edge subdivisions. Some residents said that school traffic near St. Charles North High School is already dangerous as it stands now.
Neighbors have organized: Residents from surrounding subdivisions have formed a nonprofit called Citizens for Responsible Growth and retained a law firm. One speaker said a petition opposing the development has collected more than 750 signatures. Multiple speakers noted that M/I Homes never reached out to residents after the Plan Commission recommended they do so in November.
Density remains a concern: At two homes per acre, city documents show that Claibourne Farm would be roughly double the density of adjacent subdivisions. A 2005 land plan for this area recommended no more than one unit per acre. Residents argued the proposed lot sizes, some under a quarter acre, are incompatible with the half-acre to one-acre lots that define the character of that part of town — a reason some cited for moving to St. Charles in the first place.
Officials discussed the plan: Several committee members said single-family homes are appropriate for the site and consistent with the comprehensive plan, but several pushed back on the access issue. One official estimated about a thousand residents’ daily lives would be affected by the additional traffic.
Multiple council members said a formal traffic impact study conducted during school peak hours is a critical next step. Others raised water pressure, fire safety, tree preservation, and whether annexation truly benefits the city as issues to think about.
No vote was taken. The concept plan stage is designed to gather feedback before a developer decides whether to move forward with the project.
Learn more in this agenda document and watch the full meeting recording.
📖 Thanks for reading
Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] with questions or comments.
Not signed up yet? Subscribe here.
